图书简介
This book addresses theoretical problems concerning legal evidence. The concept of evidence is expected to fulfill a number of distinct roles in science and philosophy, but also in legal theory and law, some of which are complementary, while others are conflicting. In their profession, lawyers have to deal with evidence and proof. Yet the legal concept of evidence is constantly changing, and the debate concerning the distinction between a legal concept of evidence, the ordinary concept of evidence and the concept of evidence in science is far from being settled. What is more, the problem of evidence is central to both epistemology and the philosophy of science, and by extension to our academic thinking on law. In short, legal theorists’ interest in evidence may include such diverse objects as a bloody knife, sensory data, linguistic entities or psychologically recognized beliefs. The book surveys selected theoretical roles that the concept of evidence plays and explores their relations and interconnections. The content is divided into three parts, investigating: (1) evidence in epistemology and the philosophy of science, which focuses on evidence methodologies and the problem of proof in legal scholarship; (2) evidence in legal theory and legal philosophy, where particular attention is paid to the interplay between evidence, legal reasoning and the binding force of such reasoning; and (3) evidence in law, where theoretical problems pertaining to witnesses, expert opinions, explanations of the accused, statistical evidence and neuroscientific evidence are examined.
Olivier Leclerc, Can there be a science of proof? A Cross-Atlantic dialogue (1898-1947).- Maciej Dybowski, A Good Enough (Meta) Theory of Evidence in Law. An Inferentialist Account.- Weronika Dzięgielewska, Why Are We Bound by Evidence? On The Normative Stance of Legal Proof.- Bohdan Pretkiel, Rethinking expert opinion evidence as an argument from epistemic authority.- Margarida Lacombe Camargo, Constitutional Evidence.- Giovanni Tuzet, Testimony and Hearsay.- Marcin Romanowicz, Neuroscientific Evidence in Courtroom: Clash of Two Anthropological Paradigms.- John R. Harris, An Epistemic Defense of Exclusionary Rules in the Criminal Justice System.- Adam Dyrda and Maciej Próchnicki, Expert’s (Meta)Testimony: An Epistemological Perspective.- Daniela Accatino, The Architecture of Evidential Justification between Atomism and Holism.
Trade Policy 买家须知
- 关于产品:
- ● 正版保障:本网站隶属于中国国际图书贸易集团公司,确保所有图书都是100%正版。
- ● 环保纸张:进口图书大多使用的都是环保轻型张,颜色偏黄,重量比较轻。
- ● 毛边版:即书翻页的地方,故意做成了参差不齐的样子,一般为精装版,更具收藏价值。
关于退换货:
- 由于预订产品的特殊性,采购订单正式发订后,买方不得无故取消全部或部分产品的订购。
- 由于进口图书的特殊性,发生以下情况的,请直接拒收货物,由快递返回:
- ● 外包装破损/发错货/少发货/图书外观破损/图书配件不全(例如:光盘等)
并请在工作日通过电话400-008-1110联系我们。
- 签收后,如发生以下情况,请在签收后的5个工作日内联系客服办理退换货:
- ● 缺页/错页/错印/脱线
关于发货时间:
- 一般情况下:
- ●【现货】 下单后48小时内由北京(库房)发出快递。
- ●【预订】【预售】下单后国外发货,到货时间预计5-8周左右,店铺默认中通快递,如需顺丰快递邮费到付。
- ● 需要开具发票的客户,发货时间可能在上述基础上再延后1-2个工作日(紧急发票需求,请联系010-68433105/3213);
- ● 如遇其他特殊原因,对发货时间有影响的,我们会第一时间在网站公告,敬请留意。
关于到货时间:
- 由于进口图书入境入库后,都是委托第三方快递发货,所以我们只能保证在规定时间内发出,但无法为您保证确切的到货时间。
- ● 主要城市一般2-4天
- ● 偏远地区一般4-7天
关于接听咨询电话的时间:
- 010-68433105/3213正常接听咨询电话的时间为:周一至周五上午8:30~下午5:00,周六、日及法定节假日休息,将无法接听来电,敬请谅解。
- 其它时间您也可以通过邮件联系我们:customer@readgo.cn,工作日会优先处理。
关于快递:
- ● 已付款订单:主要由中通、宅急送负责派送,订单进度查询请拨打010-68433105/3213。
本书暂无推荐
本书暂无推荐